Marine Engineering Sector M&A Transactions and Valuations

The marine engineering sector supports global trade, defense, and energy by designing, constructing, repairing, and maintaining ships, offshore structures, and maritime systems, ensuring safe, efficient, and sustainable operations. The sector experienced significant M&A activity in recent years to meet the increasing demand for advanced engineering solutions in shipbuilding, repair, and maintenance services. This report analyzes transaction trends, valuation multiples, and regional dynamics from Q1 2020 to Q3 2024, highlighting the strategic rationales behind these deals.

Valuation metrics such as EV/revenue and EV/EBITDA emphasize industry priorities, including profitability, operational efficiency, and scalability. Transactions such as Lone Star Funds’ investment in Vigor Industrial, Sembcorp Marine’s acquisition of Keppel Offshore & Marine, and Temasek Holdings’ investment into Sembcorp Marine highlight efforts to consolidate markets, advance technology, and enhance operational capabilities. These examples illustrate how M&A activity reshapes the competitive landscape and offers insights for investors, advisors, and industry leaders.

• Valuation multiples are based on a sample set of private and public M&A transactions within the marine engineering sector, using data collected on November 28, 2024.
• EV/EBITDA multiples consistently exceed EV/revenue multiples. This shows that valuations prioritize operational profitability EBITDA over revenue, without reflecting cost efficiencies. Investors assign higher valuations to companies with stronger profitability metrics, particularly in an industry where efficiency and cost management significantly influence financial performance.
• Marine engineering companies with enterprise values below $100 million show dispersion in both EV/revenue and EV/EBITDA multiples, with some outlier multiples. Higher growth expectations or elevated risk profiles often cause this dispersion. The difficulty of valuing smaller firms also contributes to the variability, as project-based revenue streams or specific market dependencies frequently cause financial metrics to fluctuate.
• Companies with enterprise values above $1 billion display tighter clustering and stabilization in EV/revenue and EV/EBITDA multiples. Established operations, diversified revenue streams, and predictable cash flows drive this stability, making larger firms less vulnerable to market fluctuations. These characteristics enable more reliable valuation methods, which are less influenced by speculative assumptions.

Capital Markets Activities

The data reflects transaction trends, valuation metrics, and regional dynamics within the sector. Demand for vessel upgrades and advancements in repair technologies have driven deal activity and valuations. The geographic distribution of deals and transaction structures has reshaped M&A dynamics and the competitive landscape.

• Investors contributed over $126 billion across 2,486 deals in the marine engineering sector between Q1 2020 and Q3 2024, with an average deal size of approximately $51 million.
• Investors deployed over $17 billion into Q4 2021, a significant increase from earlier quarters. Large-scale transactions drove this surge as companies consolidated market share, improved operational efficiencies, and entered new markets. Market optimism and post-pandemic recovery spurred the rise in investment, encouraging more ambitious deals. Larger firms pursued strategic acquisitions to gain a competitive edge in the recovering global economy.
• Capital investment peaked, but deal counts fluctuated significantly over the quarters. In Q4 2021, deal volume hit 172 transactions, highlighting a surge in M&A activity. Deal numbers declined in subsequent quarters as large-scale transactions gained prominence and smaller deals became less frequent. Market consolidation, regulatory hurdles, and a shift toward fewer, larger deals likely drove this decline. These fluctuations demonstrate the market’s volatility and evolving transaction strategies.
• Investors significantly reduced both capital investment and deal activity in the first half of 2024. In Q2 2024, they invested just over $3 billion across 106 deals, marking the lowest level in several quarters. This decline likely reflects a market slowdown driven by rising interest rates, economic uncertainty, and shifting market conditions. Investors exhibited greater caution, focusing on smaller, less capital-intensive transactions and moving away from large-scale deals. This shift indicates a preference for strategic, niche acquisitions as companies prioritized preserving capital and maintaining operational flexibility amidst uncertainty.

The graphs below present the geographic distribution of transactions, providing additional detail on regional trends and investment dynamics.

• The United States leads with 34% of capital invested and 33% of deal volume, highlighting its central role in the marine engineering sector. Advanced infrastructure and significant offshore and shipbuilding projects drive its robust market for both large-scale investments and high transaction volumes.
• Other regions collectively contribute 31% of the capital invested and 37% of the deal volume, showing a larger number of smaller-scale transactions outside major markets like the US and the UK. Emerging or niche markets account for many of these deals, where investments are typically less capital-intensive.
• The United Kingdom captures 12% of capital invested and 13% of deal volume, indicating its focus on a relatively higher number of smaller-sized deals. This suggests the UK emphasizes diversified investments in mid-sized or emerging marine engineering companies.

The deal-type dynamics below set the stage for understanding how capital flows and strategic priorities shape the revenue cycle management technology and services sector growth and landscape.

• M&A activity drives both the highest capital invested and deal count, with $73 billion invested across 1,592 transactions. Companies use M&A as a key growth strategy to expand market share, gain competitive advantages, and achieve vertical integration. Companies actively pursue synergies and consolidations through these high deal volumes to meet evolving market demands.
• Buyouts account for a smaller share of both capital and deal count, with $53 billion invested across 894 transactions. Private equity firms often lead buyouts to acquire control and improve operational efficiencies. This smaller deal count reflects a more selective approach, with firms targeting high-value opportunities over volume.
• M&A deals achieve higher activity per dollar invested compared to buyouts, averaging $46 million per deal versus $59 million for buyouts. Companies frequently use M&A for smaller-scale or diversified acquisitions, while buyouts focus on fewer but larger investments. This highlights the strategic nature of buyouts compared to the broader and more dynamic scope of M&A activity.

M&A Transactions Case Studies

Three key M&A transactions reflect strategic growth in the marine engineering sector by enhancing market positions, expanding services, and improving efficiency. These transactions align with industry demands for advanced solutions, emphasizing scalability, technology, and competitive consolidation.

---

Transaction Structure

Sembcorp Marine acquired Keppel Offshore & Marine in a transaction valued at more than $3 billion. The deal was structured as an all-stock transaction. It granted Keppel Corporation shareholders 54% ownership of the merged entity.

Market and Customer Segments Combination

The merger combined Keppel Offshore & Marine’s expertise in offshore rig design, shipbuilding, and repair with Sembcorp Marine’s focus on marine and energy engineering, forming a diversified entity that serves oil and gas, renewable energy, infrastructure, and maritime sectors. The combined customer base includes global energy companies, shipowners, and governments, enabling the new entity to capitalize on opportunities in traditional energy markets and meet the growing demand for renewable and decarbonization solutions.

Acquisition Strategic Rationale

The acquisition sought to enhance operational synergies and scale, enabling the merged entity to compete more effectively in the evolving energy and maritime sectors. By combining Keppel’s offshore engineering expertise with Sembcorp Marine’s sustainability initiatives, the company positioned itself to expand into new energy solutions, including wind farms, hydrogen projects, and decarbonization technologies. The transaction consolidated resources and reduced competition, creating a unified platform to foster innovation and drive growth in both traditional and renewable energy markets.

---

Sembcorp Marine, now known as Seatrium, is a leading global provider of innovative engineering solutions for the offshore, marine, and energy industries, with a focus on renewable energy and decarbonization technologies.

Transaction Structure

In September 2021, Temasek Holdings acquired Sembcorp Marine, a Singapore-based global marine and offshore engineering group, through a leveraged buyout valued at more than $1 billion, bringing the company’s total valuation to approximately $2 billion.

Market and Customer Segments Combination

The acquisition combined Sembcorp Marine’s expertise in offshore rig design, shipbuilding, and marine engineering with Temasek’s financial backing, enabling Sembcorp to further capitalize on opportunities in offshore wind energy and sustainable solutions. This enhanced Sembcorp Marine’s presence in both traditional energy and emerging clean energy markets, expanding its customer base across global energy firms, shipowners, and governments.

Acquisition Strategic Rationale

Temasek’s acquisition of Sembcorp was driven by its alignment with sustainability goals, leveraging Sembcorp’s renewable energy pivot to enhance its green energy presence in Asia, while streamlining portfolio synergies and governance. The move also aimed to unlock long-term value through operational restructuring, capitalize on Sembcorp’s strengthened financial position, and strengthen leadership in Asia-Pacific’s energy and infrastructure sectors, all in support of Singapore’s broader national sustainability objectives.

The marine engineering sector continues to evolve, with strategic M&A activity centered on strengthening market positions and responding to growing demand for advanced engineering solutions in ship repair, shipbuilding, and maritime services. Transactions highlight the industry’s focus on enhancing operational efficiencies, expanding technological capabilities, and consolidating market presence to stay competitive. Companies are actively pursuing growth through innovation and strategic investments, positioning themselves to capitalize on both established and emerging maritime market opportunities. These developments create significant avenues for value creation and long-term growth in the global marine engineering landscape.

Source: Defense Daily, Vigor, Maritime Executive, The Strait Times, Pitchbook Data.